Aaron Boland was arrogant, disrespectful and totally unprepared. He had had three trials in the two weeks before my three day trial. Mr Boland did not cite law when arguing motions; he says he never objects to questions or responses which is absolutely unhelpful because he does not create a record. IMHO not objecting is really malpractice. Also Boland did not get crucial exhibits into evidence—including both expert reports. He did not know that the objections to one of the expert report were not based on good grounds (question expert status, relevancy or standards used) but was based on prejudice to the other party but without stating any grounds. He did not quote Rule 26 or any case. He did not know or argue that the other side waited 36 days to file this motion to exclude the expert’s report; he did not point out that the other side was late in filing its reply…In fact Aaron seemed to be gunning for job with this law firm. Boland did not allow me to take notes or look at the defendant’s exhibits before the trial. He missed valuable opportunities to use their exhibits against them. Even though I gave him an outline of what exhibits needed to come in with what witness—he completely ignored that. However he wanted me to cull down the exhibits and was in danger of missing the deadline for the exhibits when he told me that he was “giving up his art class” on Th afternoon to get the exhibit book done. He was late filing conclusions of law and even later filing the findings of fact—so late it was useless. He apparently had no closing argument. “Well if a dog barking is a nuisance than surely flooding in a house is too” He waited forever to speak with my witnesses and waited until too late to subpoena in a city witness who was then on vacation…He is an unmitigated disaster.
Review Left On 02/26/2018
Christopher Mutimer
Aaron Boland is an aggressive and caring trial attorney. If you are looking for a criminal defense or civil attorney who fight for you in court, look no further. I %100 endorse Mr. Boland and would gladly send any family member or friend his way.
Law Firms Reviews
Also Boland did not get crucial exhibits into evidence—including both expert reports. He did not know that the objections to one of the expert report were not based on good grounds (question expert status, relevancy or standards used) but was based on prejudice to the other party but without stating any grounds. He did not quote Rule 26 or any case. He did not know or argue that the other side waited 36 days to file this motion to exclude the expert’s report; he did not point out that the other side was late in filing its reply…In fact Aaron seemed to be gunning for job with this law firm. Boland did not allow me to take notes or look at the defendant’s exhibits before the trial. He missed valuable opportunities to use their exhibits against them. Even though I gave him an outline of what exhibits needed to come in with what witness—he completely ignored that. However he wanted me to cull down the exhibits and was in danger of missing the deadline for the exhibits when he told me that he was “giving up his art class” on Th afternoon to get the exhibit book done. He was late filing conclusions of law and even later filing the findings of fact—so late it was useless. He apparently had no closing argument. “Well if a dog barking is a nuisance than surely flooding in a house is too” He waited forever to speak with my witnesses and waited until too late to subpoena in a city witness who was then on vacation…He is an unmitigated disaster.